首页> 外文OA文献 >Kitchens and pantries—helping or hindering? The perspectives of emergency food users in Victoria, Australia
【2h】

Kitchens and pantries—helping or hindering? The perspectives of emergency food users in Victoria, Australia

机译:厨房和厨房–是帮助还是阻碍?澳大利亚维多利亚州紧急食物使用者的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In high-income countries, people affected by food insecurity may seek out free/subsidized food from charities. Their perceptions of the food programs provided and preferences for alternative strategies are underresearched. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of the users’ experiences of food insecurity and gain evidence for effective responses in the future. Twelve semistructured interviews with a sample of users, who were also charity volunteers, were conducted in Victoria, Australia. A thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was undertaken. The results show that users have complex needs. Charities have both the capacity to hinder and help people maintain dignity, social inclusion, and health. Alternative community and policy food security strategies were proposed by interviewees. In the future, perspectives of affected community members must inform strategies that seek to improve people’s access to safe, nutritious, and affordable food. A human right to food framework is discussed as a mechanism to help realize food security in Australia.
机译:在高收入国家,受粮食不安全影响的人们可能会从慈善机构那里寻求免费/有补贴的食物。他们对提供的食品计划的理解以及对替代策略的偏好的研究不足。这项研究的目的是加深对用户在粮食不安全方面的经验的了解,并为未来的有效对策提供证据。在澳大利亚维多利亚州进行了十二次半结构化访谈,对样本的用户(也是慈善志愿者)进行了采访。对访谈笔录进行了主题分析。结果表明,用户具有复杂的需求。慈善机构既有能力阻碍也帮助人们维持尊严,社会包容和健康。受访者提出了替代性的社区和政策性食品安全策略。将来,受影响社区成员的观点必须成为旨在改善人们获得安全,营养和负担得起的食品的策略的参考。讨论了食物权框架,作为帮助实现澳大利亚粮食安全的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号